Get Adobe Flash player

The first example of the invoice, which is only carried out in certain circumstances, describes a situation in which the United Kingdom wishes to ensure that NI (part of the United Kingdom) has free access to one of the UK markets. The second ensures that Member States » state aid rules do not apply to a part of the UK, as has already been said, that this could have an impact on unified enterprises. Why is this considered the British government, which focuses solely on British interests? Failure to do so would allow the EU to continue to exert influence in the UK if the government has promised to take back control of all trade and legislative laws. Why is the EU not accused of jeopardising the CCM when it insists that a sensitive part of the Union be treated differently from the rest, in order to best protect its precious internal market and, at worst, to make a cynical political sleight of hand with the Irish government to widen a gap towards the Irish Sea? The UK has proposed several solutions to manage customs aspects and has been rejected by the EU. In return, any new border across the island would be seen as a reversal of peace gains under the Good Friday Agreement. This is broader than the increased security risk associated with a physical border, as formulated, among other things, by the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland. He said Mr Johnson had « supported the EU » and that he would be « very careful when it comes to reaching an agreement with him because they don`t know if it will stay. » She added: « If the UK violates its international agreements and Brexit undermines the Good Friday agreement, there will be absolutely no chance that the free trade agreement between Britain and the US will pass through Congress. The agreement contains the commitment of the British and Irish governments to develop « close cooperation between their countries as friendly neighbours and partners in the European Union » – of course, in 1998, there was no idea that the UK would vote for an EU exit 18 years later. Jess Sargeant is unconvinced by the government`s controversial Brexit moves – and warns that peace will be threatened if the government continues on its path. It is not certain that the Prime Minister is trying to put pressure on the EU, end negotiations or play certain political groups in his party. The UK`s domestic market law, published on Wednesday, contained provisions that would allow ministers to not comply with the terms of the Northern Ireland Protocol and instead apply their preferred interpretation of its provisions. Faced with a backlash from the opposition – and its own MPs – and following a furious reaction from the EU, Boris Johnson tried to say that the proposed legislation is aimed at « protecting the peace process in Northern Ireland and the Good Friday agreement. » However, a violation of international law may have the opposite effect. It could be said that a hard border would conflict with the spirit of that part of the agreement, but again, there is no specific prohibition.

A Conservative peer has warned the British government that the stoning of the Good Friday deal would be an act of « supreme madness » amid scrutiny of a controversial Brexit law. Some provisions, such as. B that the rules on food security or air quality, which were previously defined in the EU agreements, are now controlled by the devolved administrations or Westminster. The Internal Market Bill insists that devolved administrations must accept the goods and services of all UK nations, even though their standards are different on the ground. It has become even more controversial because one of its main objectives is to allow ministers to adopt regulations, even if they oppose the withdrawal agreement with the EU under the Northern Ireland Protocol. Brexit: new controls of some GB products in nor under backstop For example, last year Foreign Minister Simon Coveney wrote that the agreement had removed the barriers  » 

Les commentaires sont fermés.